Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.
Identifieur interne : 000633 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000632; suivant : 000634Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.
Auteurs : Fabrizio Pecoraro [Italie] ; Daniela Luzi [Italie] ; Fabrizio Clemente [Italie]Source :
- International journal of environmental research and public health [ 1660-4601 ] ; 2021.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- méthodes : Soins aux patients.
- épidémiologie : Italie.
- Contrôle des maladies transmissibles, Hospitalisation, Humains, Pandémies, Unités de soins intensifs.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Italie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic , epidemiology : Italy.
- epidemiology : COVID-19.
- methods : Patient Care.
- therapy : COVID-19.
- Communicable Disease Control, Hospitalization, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Pandemics.
Abstract
As the Italian health system is regionally based, COVID-19 emergency actions are based on a general lockdown imposed by national authority and then management at local level by 21 regional authorities. Therefore, the pandemic response plan developed by each region led to different approaches. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether differences in patient management may have influenced the local course of the epidemic. The analysis on the 21 Italian regions considers the strategies adopted in terms of hospitalization, treatment in the ICU and at home. Moreover, an in-depth analysis was carried out on: Lombardia, which adopted a hospitalization approach; Veneto, which tended to confine patients at home; and Emilia Romagna, which adopted a mixed hospitalization-home based approach. The majority of regions implemented a home-based approach, while the hospital approach was followed in three regions (Lombardia, Piemonte, and Lazio), mainly limited to the first period of the outbreak. All regions in the later phases tended to reduce hospitalization, preferring to confine patients at home. This comparison, highlighting the different phases of the pandemic, outlined that the adoption of home-based practices contributed to limiting infection rates among patients and health professionals as well as decreasing the number of deaths.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030848
PubMed: 33498155
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.</title><author><name sortKey="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" sort="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Pecoraro F" first="Fabrizio" last="Pecoraro">Fabrizio Pecoraro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luzi, Daniela" sort="Luzi, Daniela" uniqKey="Luzi D" first="Daniela" last="Luzi">Daniela Luzi</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clemente, Fabrizio" sort="Clemente, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Clemente F" first="Fabrizio" last="Clemente">Fabrizio Clemente</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km 29300, 00016 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km 29300, 00016 Monterotondo, Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2021">2021</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33498155</idno><idno type="pmid">33498155</idno><idno type="doi">10.3390/ijerph18030848</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000060</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000060</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.</title><author><name sortKey="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" sort="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Pecoraro F" first="Fabrizio" last="Pecoraro">Fabrizio Pecoraro</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luzi, Daniela" sort="Luzi, Daniela" uniqKey="Luzi D" first="Daniela" last="Luzi">Daniela Luzi</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clemente, Fabrizio" sort="Clemente, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Clemente F" first="Fabrizio" last="Clemente">Fabrizio Clemente</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km 29300, 00016 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km 29300, 00016 Monterotondo, Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of environmental research and public health</title><idno type="eISSN">1660-4601</idno><imprint><date when="2021" type="published">2021</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>COVID-19 (epidemiology)</term><term>COVID-19 (therapy)</term><term>Communicable Disease Control (MeSH)</term><term>Hospitalization (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Intensive Care Units (MeSH)</term><term>Italy (epidemiology)</term><term>Pandemics (MeSH)</term><term>Patient Care (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Contrôle des maladies transmissibles (MeSH)</term><term>Hospitalisation (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Italie (épidémiologie)</term><term>Pandémies (MeSH)</term><term>Soins aux patients (méthodes)</term><term>Unités de soins intensifs (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Italy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>COVID-19</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Patient Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Soins aux patients</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en"><term>COVID-19</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Italie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Communicable Disease Control</term><term>Hospitalization</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intensive Care Units</term><term>Pandemics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Contrôle des maladies transmissibles</term><term>Hospitalisation</term><term>Humains</term><term>Pandémies</term><term>Unités de soins intensifs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Italie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">As the Italian health system is regionally based, COVID-19 emergency actions are based on a general lockdown imposed by national authority and then management at local level by 21 regional authorities. Therefore, the pandemic response plan developed by each region led to different approaches. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether differences in patient management may have influenced the local course of the epidemic. The analysis on the 21 Italian regions considers the strategies adopted in terms of hospitalization, treatment in the ICU and at home. Moreover, an in-depth analysis was carried out on: Lombardia, which adopted a hospitalization approach; Veneto, which tended to confine patients at home; and Emilia Romagna, which adopted a mixed hospitalization-home based approach. The majority of regions implemented a home-based approach, while the hospital approach was followed in three regions (Lombardia, Piemonte, and Lazio), mainly limited to the first period of the outbreak. All regions in the later phases tended to reduce hospitalization, preferring to confine patients at home. This comparison, highlighting the different phases of the pandemic, outlined that the adoption of home-based practices contributed to limiting infection rates among patients and health professionals as well as decreasing the number of deaths.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33498155</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>29</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1660-4601</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>18</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>20</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of environmental research and public health</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Environ Res Public Health</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">E848</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3390/ijerph18030848</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>As the Italian health system is regionally based, COVID-19 emergency actions are based on a general lockdown imposed by national authority and then management at local level by 21 regional authorities. Therefore, the pandemic response plan developed by each region led to different approaches. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether differences in patient management may have influenced the local course of the epidemic. The analysis on the 21 Italian regions considers the strategies adopted in terms of hospitalization, treatment in the ICU and at home. Moreover, an in-depth analysis was carried out on: Lombardia, which adopted a hospitalization approach; Veneto, which tended to confine patients at home; and Emilia Romagna, which adopted a mixed hospitalization-home based approach. The majority of regions implemented a home-based approach, while the hospital approach was followed in three regions (Lombardia, Piemonte, and Lazio), mainly limited to the first period of the outbreak. All regions in the later phases tended to reduce hospitalization, preferring to confine patients at home. This comparison, highlighting the different phases of the pandemic, outlined that the adoption of home-based practices contributed to limiting infection rates among patients and health professionals as well as decreasing the number of deaths.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pecoraro</LastName><ForeName>Fabrizio</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-5718-4240</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Luzi</LastName><ForeName>Daniela</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Via Palestro, 32, 00185 Rome, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Clemente</LastName><ForeName>Fabrizio</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Crystallography, National Research Council, Via Salaria Km 29300, 00016 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Environ Res Public Health</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101238455</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1660-4601</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000086382" MajorTopicYN="N">COVID-19</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003140" MajorTopicYN="N">Communicable Disease Control</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006760" MajorTopicYN="N">Hospitalization</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007362" MajorTopicYN="N">Intensive Care Units</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007558" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Italy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058873" MajorTopicYN="Y">Pandemics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005791" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">COVID-19</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Italian regional health systems</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">epidemic outbreak phases</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">home-based care</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">hospital care</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>1</Hour><Minute>5</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2021</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33498155</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">ijerph18030848</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3390/ijerph18030848</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li></country><region><li>Latium</li></region><settlement><li>Rome</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Italie"><region name="Latium"><name sortKey="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" sort="Pecoraro, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Pecoraro F" first="Fabrizio" last="Pecoraro">Fabrizio Pecoraro</name></region><name sortKey="Clemente, Fabrizio" sort="Clemente, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Clemente F" first="Fabrizio" last="Clemente">Fabrizio Clemente</name><name sortKey="Luzi, Daniela" sort="Luzi, Daniela" uniqKey="Luzi D" first="Daniela" last="Luzi">Daniela Luzi</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/LockdownV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000633 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000633 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= LockdownV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33498155
|texte= Analysis of the Different Approaches Adopted in the Italian Regions to Care for Patients Affected by COVID-19.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33498155" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LockdownV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |